Child Welfare Groups Oppose Lowering Juvenile Offender Age, Urge Focus on Care Over Punishment

A coalition of 47 academic and welfare organizations dedicated to children and adolescents has voiced strong opposition to the proposed lowering of the age for juvenile offenders, known as 'chokbeop sonyeon.' These organizations, including the Korean Association of Child Welfare, argue that a focus on punitive justice is not only ineffective in preventing repeat offenses but also risks further marginalizing vulnerable youth. Their stance, articulated in a recent statement, highlights a critical concern: that labeling 13-year-olds with criminal records will create indelible stigmas, potentially pushing them deeper into criminal networks rather than fostering rehabilitation.

“

The punitive approach is not effective in deterring juvenile recidivism.

These experts and practitioners advocate for a more holistic approach, emphasizing that children and adolescents are indeed responsible individuals who must learn societal rules. However, they contend that the current system fails to adequately address the complex environmental factors that contribute to juvenile delinquency. Instead of immediate legal repercussions, the groups call for the strengthening of community-based care and case management systems. They stress that the state's primary responsibility lies in identifying early warning signs and providing a robust safety net, ensuring that young people have opportunities to learn and develop into self-sufficient members of society. This perspective prioritizes support and intervention over immediate punishment, viewing the latter as a superficial fix that ignores deeper systemic issues.

“

Imposing a criminal record on a 13-year-old risks pushing them into deeper criminal networks and social isolation.

The ongoing discussion surrounding the age of juvenile responsibility, initiated by President Lee Jae-myung's directive, has sparked considerable debate. While the government has engaged in public forums and deliberated through a social council, the child welfare sector's unified voice underscores a fundamental disagreement with the punitive direction. From our perspective in Korea, this debate is not merely about legal age limits; it's about our societal commitment to nurturing our youth. Western media often focuses on the crime and punishment aspect, sometimes overlooking the intricate social fabric and support systems that are crucial for juvenile development. We believe that investing in comprehensive care and addressing the socio-economic conditions that lead to crime is a far more effective and humane long-term strategy than simply lowering an age threshold and imposing harsher penalties.

“

We must first address the dire circumstances that drive children and adolescents to crime and strengthen the community's safety net.