DistantNews
๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ Taiwan /Technology

China's Pressure Forces Cancellation of Global Internet Rights Conference RightsCon

From Liberty Times · (13m ago) Chinese Critical tone

Translated from Chinese, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

TLDR

  • The global internet rights conference, RightsCon, scheduled for May 5 in Zambia, has been indefinitely postponed due to pressure from the Chinese government.
  • China objected to the participation of Taiwanese attendees, leading the Zambian government to request the conference's postponement.
  • Taiwan's Digital Minister highlighted the event's cancellation as evidence of China's suppression of freedom, democracy, and the rule of law.

The upcoming RightsCon conference, the world's largest gathering focused on internet human rights, has been abruptly canceled due to intense pressure exerted by the Chinese government. Originally slated to take place in Zambia on May 5, the event was indefinitely postponed after Zambian authorities informed the organizers, Access Now, that they were facing significant pressure from Beijing to exclude Taiwanese participants. This move has drawn sharp criticism from Taiwan, which views it as a clear demonstration of China's authoritarian tactics.

The RightsCon conference, originally scheduled for May 5 in Zambia, has been forced to cancel under pressure from China.

โ€” Lin Nien-hsuanTaiwan's Digital Minister announced the cancellation of the RightsCon conference due to Chinese pressure.

Lin Nien-hsuan, Taiwan's Digital Minister, revealed the situation on Facebook, explaining that the Chinese government's demand was specifically targeted at preventing Taiwanese attendees from participating. Access Now, upholding its founding principles against discrimination, could not comply with such a demand. Consequently, the Zambian government, under pressure, requested the indefinite postponement of the entire conference. This incident underscores the lengths to which China will go to suppress dissent and control international discourse, even on issues of fundamental human rights.

Minister Lin emphasized that RightsCon is fundamentally a non-governmental event, and Taiwanese participants do not represent the Taiwanese government. He recalled that when Taiwan hosted RightsCon in 2025, the primary role of the Ministry of Digital Affairs was to facilitate visa applications for attendees, including dissidents from regions like Tibet, Rohingya, and Kurdistan who often lack passports or nationality. This highlights Taiwan's commitment to fostering an open environment for human rights discussions, contrasting sharply with China's restrictive approach.

The Zambian government received strong pressure from the Chinese government, which did not want participants from Taiwan.

โ€” Lin Nien-hsuanTaiwan's Digital Minister explained the reason behind the conference's postponement.

This event serves as a stark reminder of the diverging paths taken by China and Taiwan regarding digital governance and individual freedoms. While China opts for a path of digital authoritarianism, Taiwan champions increased freedom, democracy, and respect for individuals. Minister Lin posited that China's primary concern is not Taiwan's official status but rather what Taiwan represents: freedom, democracy, and the rule of law, values that China actively seeks to suppress globally.

Access Now upholds its bottom line, stating that one of the purposes for which their organization was founded is to oppose such discriminatory behavior.

โ€” Lin Nien-hsuanTaiwan's Digital Minister noted Access Now's stance against discrimination.

The cancellation of RightsCon in Zambia is a significant blow to the global digital rights community. It highlights the extraterritorial reach of China's influence and its willingness to disrupt international forums that promote human rights and democratic values. Taiwan, through its vocal stance, aims to draw global attention to these tactics and reaffirm its commitment to the principles of freedom and democracy in the digital age.

China's choice is digital authoritarianism, while Taiwan chooses the latter: more freedom, democracy, and respect for each individual.

โ€” Lin Nien-hsuanTaiwan's Digital Minister contrasted the approaches of China and Taiwan regarding digital governance.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Liberty Times in Chinese. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.