CNTE's Section 9 calls SEP's class cutback a 'grave affront'; measure is 'irresponsible and authoritarian,' it accuses

The National Union of Education Workers (CNTE), through its Section 9, has voiced strong opposition to the Secretariat of Public Education's (SEP) decision to prematurely end the 2025-2026 school year. This move, shifting the closing date from July 15 to June 5, is deemed a "grave affront" to students, parents, and educators across Mexico. The CNTE argues that this unilateral and authoritarian decision, made during the National Council of Educational Authorities meeting, disregards the established academic calendar and the needs of the educational community.

“

La Coordinadora Nacional de Trabajadores de la Educación (CNTE) acusó que el cierre anticipado del ciclo escolar 2025-2026 es “una grave afrenta” contra estudiantes, madres y padres de familia, así como contra el magisterio del país.

According to the CNTE, the official justifications for this early closure—high temperatures and the World Cup—are mere pretexts. The union asserts that the true motive behind the SEP's decision is political and economic: to stifle ongoing teacher protests and curb mobilizations demanding a new ISSSTE law. This perspective frames the SEP's action not as an administrative adjustment but as a deliberate tactic to suppress dissent and maintain government control over the teaching profession.

The CNTE also leveled accusations against Alfonso Cepeda Salas, the leader of the National Union of Education Workers (SNTE), portraying him as part of a "union mafia" that collaborates with the current administration to control teachers and suppress internal opposition. This highlights a deep division within the Mexican teaching sector, with the CNTE positioning itself as the voice of genuine worker demands against a perceived co-opted leadership.

“

La medida fue impuesta “de manera irresponsable, unilateral y autoritaria” durante la 66 Reunión Nacional del Consejo Nacional de Autoridades Educativas, realizada el pasado 7 de mayo.

From the perspective of the CNTE and its supporters, this situation underscores a broader pattern of authoritarianism and disregard for workers' rights by the federal government. They see the SEP's decision as an attack on their ability to organize and advocate for better social security and labor conditions. The union's unwavering stance—that their mobilization strategies are not up for negotiation—signals a commitment to continued struggle until their demands, particularly the repeal of the 2007 ISSSTE law, are met. They are calling on President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo to intervene directly, cancel the early closure, and open a national dialogue table to address their concerns, emphasizing that neither the SEP nor the Ministry of the Interior has shown genuine willingness to engage.

“

El motivo esencial del gobierno federal es estrictamente político y económico para frenar la protesta magisterial.

This conflict is particularly significant within Mexico, where teacher unions have historically played a powerful role in national politics and social movements. The CNTE's framing of the issue as a political maneuver to suppress protest resonates with a segment of the population wary of government overreach. While international coverage might focus on the disruption to education, the CNTE emphasizes the underlying political struggle for worker rights and democratic participation within the education system, a narrative that deeply divides opinion within the country.

“

El líder del Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Educación, Alfonso Cepeda Salas, de operar como parte de una “mafia sindical charra” utilizada por los gobiernos de la llamada cuarta transformación para controlar al magisterio y contener la disidencia.