EU bans funding for Chinese solar tech over grid risks
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- The EU has banned public funding for clean tech projects utilizing specific Chinese technologies that could endanger the bloc's power grid.
- This ban, effective since early April, targets inverters from China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, including those from major firms like Huawei and Sungrow.
- The EU aims to mitigate risks of critical infrastructure disruption and prioritizes inverters made in Europe or by like-minded countries.
The European Union has taken a decisive step to safeguard its critical infrastructure by restricting public funding for clean energy projects that incorporate Chinese technology. This move underscores growing concerns within the bloc regarding its reliance on Chinese supply chains for green technologies, viewing it as a significant vulnerability.
Officials have highlighted the potential threats posed by technology from "high risk" states, specifically mentioning the possibility of remote shutdowns of member states' power grids, which could lead to widespread blackouts. The ban, which applies to new projects, focuses on inverters, described as the "brain" of solar energy systems.
Among the most pressing threats is the risk of disruption of the EUโs critical infrastructure by foreign actors.
By prioritizing inverters manufactured in Europe or sourced from allied nations like Japan, South Korea, the United States, and Switzerland, the EU signals its intent to bolster its own technological independence and reduce its susceptibility to external disruptions. This policy reflects a broader geopolitical strategy to balance the pursuit of green energy goals with national security imperatives.
In practice, this could mean a shutdown, a remote shutdown, of member statesโ networks, leading to countrywide blackouts.
Originally published by The Punch in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.