Fiji Landowners Oppose Hydro Deal, Citing Lack of Consent

A significant dispute is brewing in Namosi, Fiji, as the Namosi Landowners Committee (LAMA) voices strong objections to a proposed hydroelectric development. LAMA asserts that the project has proceeded without the crucial Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) of the customary landowners, a fundamental right that they argue has been disregarded in the pursuit of renewable energy.

“

the recently signed power purchase agreement between Energy Fiji Limited and HydroFiji is premature, arguing that key decisions have been made without Free, Prior and Informed Consent.

The committee has specifically targeted the recently signed power purchase agreement between Energy Fiji Limited and HydroFiji, labeling it as premature. While LAMA acknowledges and supports Fiji's transition to renewable energy, it firmly believes that this national objective should not come at the expense of the rights and well-being of local communities. The scale of the proposed hydro project, they contend, raises serious environmental, cultural, and social concerns that warrant thorough consideration and inclusive development grounded in proper consultation.

“

the scale of the proposed hydro project raises serious environmental, cultural and social concerns for the people of Namosi, adding that development must be inclusive and grounded in proper consultation.

Further complicating matters, LAMA has questioned the project's operational model. The arrangement where HydroFiji will finance, own, and operate the facilities while selling electricity to Energy Fiji Limited raises concerns about long-term control, accountability, and the potential impacts on customary land. The committee also refutes claims of minimal environmental impact, warning that any hydro development inevitably affects river systems and traditional land use patterns, which are vital to the Namosi people.

“

any hydro development would inevitably affect river systems and traditional land use.

LAMA's core grievance lies in the sequencing of engagement, arguing that consultation is being treated as an afterthought rather than a prerequisite to decision-making. They maintain that no project should advance while related concerns remain unresolved and are currently before the Fiji Human Rights and Anti-Discrimination Commission. The message from Namosi is clear: landowners are not inherently against development, but they will resolutely oppose any project that is imposed upon them without their genuine consent and participation. This stance underscores a critical dialogue in Fiji about balancing national development goals with the protection of indigenous rights and environmental stewardship.

“

landowners are not against development, but will oppose any project imposed without their consent.