Icelandic PM Reserves Veto Power Over EU Accession Deal

Prime Minister Kristrún Frostadóttir has asserted a significant prerogative in Iceland's potential European Union accession, stating she will personally vet any final agreement and will not submit it for a national referendum unless it fully safeguards Iceland's sovereignty, independence, and long-term economic interests. This declaration, made during a meeting with the parliamentary committee on foreign affairs, marks a notable shift from the previously established process.

Historically, Iceland's EU aspirations have been contingent on a two-stage national referendum. The initial vote would determine whether to resume accession talks from where they left off, and a subsequent vote would decide on the approval of a final accession treaty. However, Frostadóttir's statement suggests a more centralized decision-making process, where her personal judgment will be the ultimate arbiter of whether an agreement is even presented to the public.

This move has prompted discussion and some consternation. While the Prime Minister expressed confidence in her decision-making, she did not elaborate on the specific criteria or metrics she will use to evaluate an agreement. Legal scholars, approached by Morgunblaðið, have refrained from detailed comment but noted that this approach might conflict with recommendations from the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe, which emphasizes clarity and predictability for voters in such processes.

Furthermore, Frostadóttir indicated that should Iceland join the EU, European law would apply, but the government would leverage accession negotiations to advocate for changes to European law concerning vital Icelandic interests. This nuanced position highlights a desire to engage with the EU on Iceland's terms, prioritizing national concerns within the broader European legal framework. The implications of this altered process are still unfolding, with some opposition members viewing it as a disruption, whether intentional or accidental.

“

I will say yes in August, but I also want a good agreement. And I will never propose a treaty for a second referendum that I do not believe strengthens our sovereignty, independence, and economic interests in the long term.