Indonesian Court Orders Acid Attack Victim's Testimony at May 13 Hearing
Translated from Indonesian, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- An Indonesian military court judge ordered prosecutors to bring an activist to a hearing on May 13.
- The activist, Andrie Yunus from KontraS, was absent due to skin graft surgery, according to the military prosecutor.
- Yunus had previously objected to a military trial for his attackers, preferring a public court for justice.
The trial of activist Andrie Yunus for the acid attack he suffered continues to be a focal point in Indonesia's pursuit of justice. Presiding judge Kolonel Chk Fredy Ferdian Isnartanto's directive for prosecutors to ensure Yunus's presence at the May 13 hearing underscores the court's commitment to hearing directly from the victim.
The military prosecutor's explanation for Yunus's absence, citing skin graft surgery and information from the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK), highlights the serious nature of his injuries. The judge's probing questions and the prosecutor's assurances that efforts will continue to secure Yunus's testimony, whether in person or via video conference, demonstrate the court's diligence.
Please, we will summon him again because today and tomorrow will definitely be recovery, treatment. Maybe we will summon him again on the 13th, as a second alternative, we will use video conference.
Yunus's earlier stance against a military trial, advocating for a public court to ensure fairness and prevent impunity, remains a critical aspect of this case. His objection and declaration of no confidence in the military court system, as detailed in his letter dated April 3, 2026, reflect a broader concern for human rights and due process in Indonesia. The involvement of four members of the Strategic Intelligence Agency (Bais) TNI as defendants further complicates the narrative, raising questions about accountability within military ranks.
This case is particularly significant in Indonesia as it navigates the complex intersection of military justice and civilian rights. The public's attention is keenly focused on whether the legal proceedings will uphold the principles of justice for victims of such violent acts, especially when perpetrators are members of the armed forces. The outcome will undoubtedly be watched closely as a measure of Indonesia's progress in ensuring equal justice under the law.
I object and declare a vote of no confidence.
Originally published by Tempo in Indonesian. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.