Lithuania Proposes UN, UNESCO Action Against Russia's Destruction of Historical Monuments

Lithuanian parliamentarians have taken a significant step by registering a resolution to address the systematic destruction of historical and cultural memory in Russia. This move, spearheaded by the Foreign Affairs Committee, reflects a deep-seated concern within Lithuania regarding Moscow's attempts to rewrite history and erase the memory of Soviet-era crimes.

“

sąmoningo totalitarinio režimo aukų ir kultūrinio atminimo bei paveldo naikinimo veiksmus Rusijos Federacijoje

The resolution specifically targets the demolition of monuments and cultural symbols in regions like Tomsk and Kaliningrad, which were erected with Lithuanian state funding and local approval. By appealing to international bodies such as the UN and UNESCO, Lithuania seeks to garner global support in defending historical truth and the freedom of remembrance. This is not merely about preserving stones and plaques; it is about safeguarding national identity and resisting a narrative that seeks to legitimize past and present aggressions.

“

barbariškus Rusijos Federacijos valdžios veiksmus

The Lithuanian perspective views these actions as a continuation of a neo-Stalinist policy, aimed at fabricating a pseudo-historical narrative that denies Soviet repressions. This is seen as a dangerous trend with far-reaching implications for European security and historical consciousness. From Vilnius, Russia's efforts to distort historical facts are perceived as a direct attempt to divide the world into spheres of influence, downplay the suffering caused by occupations, and ultimately justify its aggressive foreign policy, particularly towards Ukraine and the Baltic states.

“

Istorinės atminties simboliai ir kultūros paveldas yra svarbi tautų tapatybės dalis ir jų naikinimas negali būti pateisinamas jokiais imperiniais ar politiniais interesais

This resolution underscores Lithuania's commitment to confronting historical revisionism. It highlights a unique national perspective that views the destruction of historical memory not just as an act against Lithuania, but as an assault on the very principles of international law and historical integrity. The emphasis on the fact that these monuments were built legally and with consent underscores the arbitrary and politically motivated nature of their destruction, a point that resonates strongly within a nation that has experienced Soviet occupation firsthand.

“

kaip nuoseklią neostalinizmo politiką, kurios tikslas – ištrinti totalitarinio režimo nusikaltimų atmintį ir formuoti pseudoistorinį naratyvą (esą Sovietų Sąjungoje politinių represijų nebuvo)