MCG Tower, Which Became a Grave for 14 People in the February 6 Earthquakes, 'Expert' Report: All Defendants, Including Municipal Officials, 'Primarily Responsible'
Translated from Turkish, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- A 'forensic' report on the MCG Tower in İskenderun, which collapsed during the February 6 earthquakes killing 14 people, has been submitted to the court.
- The report identifies all defendants, including municipal officials, as 'primarily responsible' for the building's collapse.
- Legal proceedings are underway with charges of 'causing death and injury by conscious negligence' against 14 individuals.
The devastating collapse of the MCG Tower in İskenderun during the February 6 earthquakes, which claimed the lives of 14 people, continues to be a focal point of justice in Hatay. Cumhuriyet reports on the submission of a crucial 'expert' report to the court, a document that meticulously details the failures leading to this tragedy. This report, compiled by nine academics from various Turkish universities, assigns primary responsibility not only to the construction professionals but also to municipal officials.
Bilirkişi raporunda, müteahhit, şantiye şefi, statik/betonarme proje müellifi, zemin iyileştirme projesi müellifi, zemin iyileştirme uygulama müellifi firma, yapı denetim firması, statik/betonarme proje ve uygulama denetçisi ile yapı denetim firmasının diğer yetkilileri, kontrol elemanı ve ilgili belediye görevlilerinin "asli kusurlu" bulunduğu belirtildi.
This latest report, the third of its kind requested by the court, is a significant development in the ongoing legal battle. It explicitly names the contractor, site chief, structural and concrete project designers, ground improvement project designers, the firm responsible for ground improvement implementation, the construction supervision firm, its controllers, and crucially, relevant municipal officials as 'primarily culpable.' This comprehensive indictment underscores the systemic failures that allowed such a disaster to occur.
Binanın oturduğu alanda, zemin iyileştirme projesinde belirtilen iyileştirmenin projeye uygun yapılmadığı görülmüştür. Yapının taşıyıcı sistem planında, merdiven ve asansör boşluklarının bulunduğu bölgelerde taşıyıcı sistem sürekliliğinin zayıf olduğu, bazı akslarda çerçeve sürekliliğinin sağlanamadığı ve tali kiriş ağırlıklı bir taşıyıcı düzenin bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir.
Our reporting at Cumhuriyet emphasizes the gravity of these findings. The report highlights critical flaws, including deviations from the ground improvement project, weaknesses in the building's structural continuity, and the use of substandard concrete. These are not mere oversights; they are critical errors that directly contributed to the loss of life. The inclusion of municipal officials in the list of those primarily responsible sends a clear message: accountability must extend to those in positions of authority who are tasked with ensuring public safety and enforcing building codes. This case is a stark reminder of the human cost of negligence and corruption in construction, a reality we must confront head-on.
Binanın bazı katlarının yapımında kullanılan beton kalitesinin, projede belirtilen beton sınıfı ile uyumlu olmadığı; standart değeri sağlamayan bir beton kullanıldığı görülmüştür.
Originally published by Cumhuriyet in Turkish. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.