Path to CAS exists for Malaysian clubs, depending on case type – MFL

Malaysian football is navigating the complexities of its dispute resolution mechanisms, with the Malaysian Football League (MFL) clarifying the avenues available to clubs. Utusan Malaysia reports on the MFL CEO's explanation regarding appeals, emphasizing that while the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) is accessible, its application is nuanced.

“

Actually, for cases brought to CAS, there is indeed a pathway allowed in the FAM statutes and in line with FIFA regulations. However, that pathway is specifically for cases involving international disputes, especially when FIFA's decision is the basis for appeal.

The core of the MFL's message is that domestic football matters, such as disciplinary issues and status disputes, are primarily handled within Malaysia. The Football Association of Malaysia (FAM) serves as the initial adjudicator, with further appeals directed to the Asian International Arbitration Centre (AIAC). This tiered approach, the MFL argues, is designed to be more financially feasible for clubs, players, and officials, sparing them the significant costs associated with international arbitration.

This clarification comes in response to concerns raised by Selangor FC's CEO about the need for clubs to have direct access to CAS. The MFL's stance reflects a strategic decision to streamline processes and manage resources effectively within the Malaysian football ecosystem. While acknowledging the existence of a pathway to CAS, particularly for international disputes aligned with FIFA regulations, the league is prioritizing domestic resolution mechanisms.

“

For local cases, all disputes related to discipline and status will be handled at the FAM level and appealed at AIAC. In this context, the same arbitration concept as CAS is still used, but implemented through AIAC in Malaysia.

From a Malaysian perspective, this is about balancing international standards with local realities. The MFL's emphasis on reducing financial burdens is a practical consideration for clubs operating within the Malaysian context. The AIAC, while not CAS itself, functions on similar arbitration principles, offering a localized and potentially more affordable alternative. This approach underscores a desire to strengthen domestic governance while still maintaining connections to global football regulations, ensuring that while local issues are resolved locally, international standards are not entirely disregarded.

“

From a rational perspective, this approach is taken to prevent clubs, players, and officials from bearing high costs. The process at CAS involves significant costs, with the initial deposit alone around CHF 1,000 (RM5,000), followed by advance payments depending on the case category, as well as significant legal costs.