S’Court will settle Kano emirship tussle, says Ganduje

The protracted Kano emirship tussle continues to be a focal point of traditional and political discourse in Nigeria, with former All Progressives Congress (APC) National Chairman, Dr. Abdullahi Ganduje, weighing in on the matter. Ganduje asserted that the ultimate resolution of the dispute, including the fate of Muhammadu Sanusi II, rests solely with the Supreme Court. His statement aims to temper speculation and emphasize the judicial process as the definitive arbiter in this high-profile traditional leadership contest.

“

It is important to clarify that what happened was simply an expression of respect in a public gathering. It should not be misconstrued as an endorsement.

Ganduje's remarks come in response to reports suggesting he had endorsed Sanusi as the Emir of Kano. He vehemently dismissed these claims, clarifying that his use of Sanusi's traditional title during a recent swearing-in ceremony was a mere expression of respect in a public gathering, not a political endorsement. This clarification is crucial in a context where traditional titles and their usage can be politically charged, and Ganduje, as a former governor and party chairman, holds significant influence. He stressed that the emirship matter remains sub judice, warning against any statements that could prejudice ongoing court proceedings or constitute contempt of court.

“

The subsisting legal position recognises Aminu Ado Bayero as the 15th Emir of Kano and Muhammadu Sanusi II as the 14th Emir, pending the final judgment of the Supreme Court.

The former governor highlighted the current legal standing, noting that the Court of Appeal had mandated all parties to maintain the status quo. This means that both Aminu Ado Bayero and Muhammadu Sanusi II are recognized in their respective capacities pending the Supreme Court's final judgment, which is reportedly expected in April next year. Ganduje underscored his own lack of constitutional authority to endorse or reject claimants, firmly placing the responsibility with the judiciary and the Kano State Government for implementation. His comments reflect the intricate interplay between traditional institutions, legal frameworks, and political governance in Nigeria, where such disputes often capture national attention and require careful navigation.

“

The interpretation being given to the remark is clearly exaggerated. I urge all parties to exercise restraint and await the Supreme Court judgment, which is expected to be delivered in April next year.