Trump: Iran would use nuclear weapon if it had one; praises military successes in Operation Epic Fury
Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.
TLDR
- Former US President Donald Trump stated that Iran would use a nuclear weapon if it acquired one, emphasizing the need for guarantees against nuclear development for lasting peace.
- Trump detailed the successes of Operation Epic Fury, claiming Iran's navy, air force, and leadership have been destroyed, leading to severe economic pressure including a 100% effective blockade on oil.
- He asserted that his actions are popular globally and criticized allies, including NATO, for not taking stronger action against Iran.
From the perspective of The Jerusalem Post, former President Donald Trump's strong stance on Iran reflects a decisive approach to national security that resonates with a segment of the Israeli public concerned about Tehran's nuclear ambitions and regional influence. Trump's assertion that Iran would use a nuclear weapon if it obtained one, coupled with his description of significant military successes under Operation Epic Fury, aligns with a view that aggressive deterrence and direct action are necessary to counter perceived threats from the Islamic Republic.
I will tell you that Iran would use the nuclear weapon if they had it. I deal with these people. I know people. They will use their nuclear weapons, and we're not going to give them a chance to do it.
The article highlights Trump's focus on securing a "firm guarantee" against Iran's nuclear development, framing it as the ultimate objective, even more critical than the military damage inflicted. This emphasis on preventing a nuclear-armed Iran is a paramount concern for Israel, and Trump's rhetoric on this issue is likely to be viewed favorably by those who advocate for a hardline policy towards Tehran. The report also touches upon the economic pressure Trump claims to have imposed, such as the effective blockade of oil exports, which, if accurate, would represent a significant blow to Iran's economy.
We have to have guarantees they will never have a nuclear weapon.
Trump's criticism of allies, including NATO, for not participating more actively in confronting Iran, also reflects a sentiment often heard in Israel โ that the international community, particularly European nations, has not been sufficiently forceful in addressing the Iranian threat. His claim that his actions are "very popular" and that "the world is thanking me" suggests a belief in the effectiveness and broad acceptance of his policies, even if other nations are hesitant to join him directly. This perspective underscores a desire for strong, unwavering leadership in confronting adversaries, a trait often associated with Trump's previous presidency and one that appeals to those seeking a robust security posture.
I wouldn't have approved that. I wouldn't have. I'm not giving them anything. They're going to either have a nuclear weapon, or they're not. And if they do, they're in big trouble.
Originally published by Jerusalem Post in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.