Ummat Party Questions Removal of Amien Rais Video on Prabowo

The Ummat Party has voiced strong objections to the removal of a video from Amien Rais's personal YouTube account, which contained sensitive allegations regarding President Prabowo Subianto and Cabinet Secretary Teddy Indra Wijaya. Party officials, including Secretary Ansufri Idrus Sambo, are questioning the platform's decision, perceiving it as an act of censorship that stifles criticism in a democratic nation. Sambo specifically highlighted the perceived double standard, noting the rapid removal of Rais's video while problematic content like online gambling remains accessible. This incident has ignited a debate about freedom of expression and the government's sensitivity to public discourse in Indonesia. The Ummat Party, known for its straightforward approach to voicing dissent, plans to formally protest the video's removal, emphasizing that Rais's allegations were already circulating widely on social media. They are prepared to engage legally if necessary, underscoring their commitment to defending their right to speak out against perceived misconduct.

“

Yes, they (took down Amien Rais' video) because they have the power to do so.

From our perspective at Tempo, this situation raises critical questions about digital platform accountability and the Indonesian government's stance on political speech. While the platform's terms of service may have been cited, the timing and context of the removal, especially in relation to other online content, fuel suspicions of political influence. The Ummat Party's reaction is not just about a single video; it's a broader statement about the space for criticism in Indonesia's evolving political landscape. The party's willingness to challenge this decision legally demonstrates a resolve to push back against what they see as undue restrictions on public discourse. This event is particularly significant as it involves prominent political figures and touches upon sensitive social and personal matters, making its handling a barometer for democratic freedoms in the country.

“

We are also puzzled, because when it comes to this kind of issue (criticism), the response is very quick. What about online gambling? Many inaccurate contents are left untouched, so it's not fair.