Understanding the Regent's Position in the PT Bandung Daya Sentosa Case

Bandung Regent Dadang Supriatna's first year in his second term has been marked by both notable achievements and significant challenges, according to a local government observer. Speaking on a radio program, the observer aimed for a neutral, comprehensive, and objective assessment of the Regent's performance.

While acknowledging the Regent's efforts in realizing the vision of 'Bandung BEDAS' (Bupati Endang Dadang-Ahmad Syaikhu), which has led to positive outcomes and increased public satisfaction, the observer also addressed a public concern: alleged corruption involving the management of PT Bandung Daya Sentosa (PT BDS), a regional-owned enterprise. This issue garnered considerable media attention, with some narratives incorrectly attributing direct responsibility to the Regent.

The observer clarified that the legal process was still in its early stages of investigation by the Bandung Regency Prosecutor's Office at the time. He urged the public to avoid forming unsubstantiated conclusions and to respect the ongoing judicial proceedings.

According to regional regulations, the Regent's role as a shareholder, or Capital Owner's Representative (KPM), is limited to the capital investment made from the regional budget. This means the Regent is not personally liable for company losses unless his direct involvement is proven through legal channels. As the trial for the alleged PT BDS corruption case progresses, with defendants and witnesses presenting their accounts, the public is encouraged to view the matter proportionally and uphold the principle of presumed innocence.