Atiku Warns Against Suspending Campaigns Over Insecurity, Cites Disenfranchisement Fears

The Nigerian political landscape is once again grappling with the delicate balance between national security and democratic rights, a tension that former Vice President Atiku Abubakar has sharply articulated. His recent warning against suspending political campaigns in the North, citing escalating insecurity in states like Borno, Benue, and Plateau, underscores a deep-seated concern among citizens and political actors.

“

Let it be clearly stated that the right to vote and participate in the electoral process is fundamental and cannot be abridged under any guise.

Abubakar’s stance, as conveyed through his spokesperson Phrank Shaibu, is that insecurity, while a grave national challenge, must not become a pretext for curtailing fundamental democratic processes. He rightly points out that the right to vote and participate in elections is sacrosanct and cannot be arbitrarily abridged. This perspective resonates with many Nigerians who fear that such measures could be exploited to disenfranchise voters, particularly in regions already facing significant hardships.

“

Any attempt—whether deliberate or disguised—to suppress political activities in parts of Northern Nigeria raises legitimate concerns about disenfranchisement.

The former Vice President’s assertion that democracy should not be a casualty of government failure is a powerful indictment of the current security situation. He highlights that citizens in the North deserve both security and the full exercise of their civic rights, arguing that these are not mutually exclusive. The call for clarity from the Independent National Electoral Commission, security agencies, and President Bola Tinubu's administration reflects a broader demand for transparency and reassurance that no part of the country will be excluded from the democratic process.

“

This is not merely about campaigns; it is about representation, inclusion, and the integrity of our democratic process. You cannot cure insecurity by silencing the voices of the people. Democracy must not become a casualty of government failure.

This debate is particularly poignant in Nigeria, where elections are often keenly contested and the integrity of the process is paramount. The fear of disenfranchisement is not abstract; it touches upon the very essence of representation and inclusion. Abubakar’s intervention serves as a crucial reminder that while the government has a duty to protect its citizens, it also has an obligation to uphold the democratic principles that underpin the nation’s governance. Any policy that appears to target specific regions for exclusion, even under the guise of security, risks deepening distrust and national division, a sentiment that resonates strongly within the Nigerian context.

“

At a time when citizens are already battling hardship and insecurity, the least the government can do is to guarantee their right to be heard—not to restrict it. Any policy that creates the impression of targeted exclusion will only deepen distrust and national division.