DistantNews
Japanese public opinion shifts: Majority now favor constitutional revision, but caution prevails on pace
๐Ÿ‡ฐ๐Ÿ‡ท South Korea /Elections & Politics

Japanese public opinion shifts: Majority now favor constitutional revision, but caution prevails on pace

From Dong-A Ilbo · (11m ago) Korean

Translated from Korean, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

TLDR

  • A recent poll indicates that 47% of Japanese citizens support constitutional revision under the current administration, surpassing opposition for the first time since 2016.
  • While public support for constitutional reform is growing, a majority (62%) believe there is no need to rush the process.
  • Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's administration aims to amend Article 9, which renounces war and prohibits maintaining military forces, sparking concerns about Japan's potential militarization.

The latest public opinion surveys reveal a significant shift in Japanese sentiment regarding constitutional reform. For the first time since tracking began in 2016, a majority of respondents now favor amending the nation's post-war constitution under the current administration. This development, highlighted by Asahi Shimbun, suggests a growing public willingness to reconsider the foundational document, particularly in light of evolving regional security dynamics.

In the public opinion poll conducted nationwide in March and April, 47% of respondents answered, 'We agree with constitutional revision under the current administration.'

โ€” Asahi ShimbunReporting on the results of a nationwide public opinion poll regarding constitutional revision.

However, the data also underscores a prevailing caution among the populace. A substantial 62% expressed that there is no need to expedite constitutional revision, indicating a preference for a more measured approach. This sentiment is echoed in a separate Kyodo News poll, where a slim majority supported revising Article 9, the cornerstone of Japan's 'peace constitution' that renounces war and prohibits the maintenance of military forces. The rationale often cited includes the changing security environment and the need to address the constitutional status of the Self-Defense Forces.

The proportion of those who answered 'There is no need to rush constitutional revision' was 62%, which was nearly double the 33% who answered 'There is.'

โ€” Asahi ShimbunHighlighting the public's cautious approach to the pace of constitutional reform.

Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's administration has been vocal about its intentions to amend the constitution, with key proposals including enshrining the Self-Defense Forces, strengthening the cabinet's powers during emergencies, and enhancing education. The push to amend Article 9, in particular, is seen by proponents as a necessary step to bolster national security and assert a stronger international presence. Yet, this ambition is met with apprehension, both domestically and internationally, regarding the potential for accelerated militarization and the implications for regional stability. From our perspective at Dong-A Ilbo, this evolving public opinion reflects a nation grappling with its security identity in a complex geopolitical landscape, balancing the desire for a more robust defense with a deep-seated historical aversion to military expansion.

In a public opinion poll conducted by Kyodo News during the same period, the response that 'revision is necessary' (50%) was higher than 'revision is not necessary' (48%) regarding the revision of Article 9 of the Constitution, which stipulates Japan's 'renunciation of war' and 'prohibition of maintaining military forces.'

โ€” Kyodo NewsPresenting findings from another poll on the necessity of revising Article 9.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Dong-A Ilbo in Korean. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.