DistantNews
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Nigeria /Crime & Justice

Nigerian Court Awards N100 Million Damages Against SERAP in Defamation Case

From ThisDay · (38m ago) English Critical tone

Translated from English, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

TLDR

  • A Nigerian court awarded N100 million in damages against SERAP in a defamation suit filed by two DSS operatives.
  • The court found SERAP liable for defamatory claims and ordered a public apology and payment of damages with 10% annual interest.
  • The case originated from SERAP's allegations of unlawful invasion and harassment by DSS operatives, which investigations reportedly did not support.

The Nigerian judiciary has delivered a significant ruling, ordering the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) to pay N100 million in damages to two Department of State Services (DSS) operatives. This judgment, handed down by the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, found SERAP liable for defamatory statements made against the operatives.

SERAP liable for defamatory claims made against the DSS operatives and ordered the organisation to pay N100 million as general damages.

โ€” High Court of the Federal Capital TerritoryThe court's judgment on the defamation suit.

SERAP had accused DSS operatives of unlawfully invading its Abuja office and harassing its staff in a statement issued on September 9, 2024. This led to the suspension and internal disciplinary process for the operatives. However, subsequent investigations by the DSS reportedly found no evidence to substantiate these claims, prompting the operatives to file a substantial defamation suit.

unlawfully invadedโ€ its Abuja office and โ€œharassed and intimidatedโ€ its staff.

โ€” SERAPThe organization's original allegations against DSS operatives.

The court's decision not only mandates a hefty monetary compensation but also requires SERAP to issue a public apology across its social media platforms and in national newspapers and television stations. The judgment underscores the legal ramifications of unsubstantiated allegations, particularly when they impact the professional standing of state security operatives. This ruling serves as a crucial reminder for civil society organizations to exercise due diligence and verify information before making public accusations that could lead to severe legal and financial consequences.

injured the reputation of the claimants in their professional capacity/standing.

โ€” Justice Halilu YusufThe judge's reasoning for finding SERAP liable.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by ThisDay in English. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.