DistantNews

Strong Protests Against Increased Taxation

From Morgunblaðið · (11m ago) Icelandic Critical tone

Translated from Icelandic, summarized and contextualized by DistantNews.

TLDR

  • Financial sector companies in Iceland strongly oppose proposed tax increases outlined in the government's financial plan for 2027-2031.
  • The Association of Financial Service Companies (SFF) criticizes the lack of consultation and the imposition of new, unspecified taxes on an already heavily taxed sector.
  • SFF warns that these potential tax hikes could negatively impact the financial market, foreign investment, and lending to households and businesses.

The Association of Financial Service Companies (SFF) has issued a strong rebuke of the government's proposed tax hikes on the financial sector, as detailed in the financial plan for 2027-2031. The SFF argues that these plans are not only surprising but also come after a period where financial firms have already been subjected to significant and burdensome specific levies, higher capital requirements, and stricter reserve obligations compared to their international counterparts.

Væri nær að vinda ofan af sköttum

— SFFStating that it would be more appropriate to reduce existing taxes rather than add new ones.

Central to the SFF's criticism is the complete lack of prior consultation with the association before these proposals were put forth. This has left the SFF in the dark regarding the specifics of the planned increases, including their nature, implementation, duration, and target. The association points out that Icelandic financial firms already grapple with a special tax on debt, a financial services tax on profits, and a payroll tax, in addition to supervisory fees from the Central Bank of Iceland and charges for the Debtors' Ombudsman's office. This cumulative tax and fee environment, the SFF contends, is far more onerous than that faced by most other industries.

Í umsögninni er sérstaklega gagnrýnt að ekkert samráð hafi verið haft við SFF áður en áformin voru sett fram.

— SFFCriticizing the lack of consultation before the tax increase proposals were made.

Furthermore, the SFF highlights the recent increase in banks' non-interest-bearing reserve requirement from 1% to 3% in 2023 and 2024. While not formally a tax, this measure forces financial institutions to hold funds with the Central Bank without earning interest, amounting to an estimated loss of 8 billion Icelandic krónur annually in lost interest income for lenders. The association warns that such uncertainty and unpredictable tax changes could deter foreign investors, disrupt financing for financial companies, and ultimately affect the availability and cost of credit for households and businesses.

SFF segja þetta nema um átta milljörðum króna á ári í töpuðum vaxtatekjum fyrir lánveitendur.

— SFFQuantifying the financial impact of increased reserve requirements.

The SFF emphasizes that the burden of these taxes is not solely borne by the companies themselves. Given that the public is a major shareholder in the banking system, directly and indirectly through pension funds and the state treasury, a portion of any increased tax burden will inevitably fall upon the general populace. The association is calling for further dialogue with the government before any decisions are made, arguing that the proposed tax hikes contradict the government's stated goals of simplifying regulations, enhancing competitiveness, attracting foreign investment, and fostering economic growth.

Almenningur beri byrðarnar einnig

— SFFArguing that the general public will also bear the burden of increased taxes.
DistantNews Editorial

Originally published by Morgunblaðið in Icelandic. Translated, summarized, and contextualized by our editorial team with added local perspective. Read our editorial standards.