US trade court blocks Trump's global tariffs

The United States International Trade Court has delivered a significant blow to President Donald Trump's trade agenda, invalidating his 10% global tariffs. This decision, a 2-1 majority ruling, temporarily halts the tariffs on specific companies and the state of Washington, though it opens the door for further legal battles. The court found that the legal basis for implementing these tariffs, a 1970s-era law, was insufficient.

These tariffs, introduced in February, were intended to address the nation's balance of payments deficit. However, the court's decision highlights a fundamental disconnect between the administration's actions and existing legal frameworks. The ruling specifically stated that Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, invoked by the administration, was enacted in response to a specific historical crisis and does not apply to the current situation, which involves a trade deficit rather than a balance of payments issue.

“

Seksyen 122 diluluskan sebagai tindak balas kepada krisis sejarah tertentu yang menyebabkan rizab mata wang dan emas AS berkurangan.

While this ruling directly impacts the temporary 10% tariffs, other sector-specific tariffs, such as those on steel, aluminum, and vehicles, remain unaffected for now. Nevertheless, this judicial setback complicates Trump's broader tariff strategy. The administration is reportedly exploring more permanent measures to reshape its trade policy, including new investigations into forced labor and overcapacity among trading partners. The court has ordered the defendants to comply within five days and ensure refunds for importers who filed suits. The Trump administration retains the option to appeal this decision.

“

AS mempunyai defisit perdagangan, bukan defisit imbangan pembayaran dan tidak mempunyai masalah pembayaran antarabangsa.