Trump trade chief says US wants balanced trade, not change to China’s system

As President Donald Trump prepares for a pivotal visit to China, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer has articulated a nuanced approach to the bilateral trade relationship. Greer clarified that the US objective is not to fundamentally reshape China's economic model but rather to achieve a more balanced trade dynamic. This statement aims to set a pragmatic tone for the upcoming high-stakes discussions, emphasizing stability and mutual optimization of trade flows rather than demanding systemic change from Beijing.

“

Our goal going forward is to have stability

Greer highlighted the long-standing, yet "wildly unbalanced," trading relationship between the two economic giants. He pointed out China's substantial exports to the US while simultaneously restricting many American imports. The goal moving forward, he stated, is to "optimize trade between China and the US to achieve more balance." This suggests a focus on tangible outcomes, such as adjusting the volume and types of goods traded, rather than engaging in ideological battles over governance or economic management systems. The US seeks a "conversation with China about bottom line outcomes," indicating a desire for concrete agreements on trade volumes and product categories.

“

I think there’s not really a situation where we go and get China to change the way they govern, the way they manage their economy, that’s all baked into their system. But I think there is a world where we find out where we can optimise trade between China and the US to achieve more balance.

The upcoming summit between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing is expected to cover a broad agenda, including bilateral ties, the ongoing Iran conflict, and the sensitive issue of Taiwan. Greer's remarks provide a backdrop to these discussions, signaling a US willingness to engage constructively while firmly advocating for a more equitable trade partnership. The emphasis on "stability" and "balance" suggests a strategic effort to manage the complex relationship between the two powers, seeking practical solutions that benefit both economies without escalating tensions over fundamental differences in their systems.

“

We think we can have a conversation with China about bottom line outcomes, how much can we be shipping to them, how much should they ship to us, [and] what kind of goods should those be